Can TripAdvisor.com be trusted?
CLIVE DORMAN
REAL STORY: The Rees in Queenstown has suffered from reviews written about a different hotel that were mistakenly posted.
Related Links
Relevant offers
OPINION: Since it was founded in 2000, TripAdvisor.com has revolutionised the way people buy travel online by giving them access to reviews of accommodation providers around the world by other ordinary consumers.
TripAdvisor took buying hotel rooms out of the stone age where you had to rely on pot luck, the word of friends who had been there or a trusty old travel guide like Lonely Planet to strip away the advertising hype and give you a true rating.
But it has always been a leap of faith to trust that TripAdvisor's consumer reviews were the real thing. At first, there were allegations that hotels were manipulating the system by "planting" positive reviews to counteract the honesty of damning consumer opinions. Now the discussion is about whether the opposite is happening.
The latest controversy erupted after TripAdvisor.com named a hotel in Singapore the worst in its 2011 list of Asia's Top 10 dirtiest hotels. The New Paper in Singapore reported that Goldkist Beach Resort's manager, Vikas Gupta, last year wrote a letter to TripAdvisor and Expedia Singapore inviting the online hotel review site to inspect the resort and subsequently remove it from its list of dirtiest hotels.
"The negative reviews on TripAdvisor continued to give us problems," Gupta said. "Thereafter, we decided not to continue loading room inventories into Expedia.com.
"Not long after, our guests started calling and emailing us to say their positive reviews on Goldkist were not appearing on TripAdvisor. Also, when I replied to some of the negative reviews on TripAdvisor, they were not published."
Gupta said Goldkist had also received an email from TripAdvisor asking the resort to "sign up for an annual subscription" and join its business listings. "On many online forums, hoteliers had said that once they paid the subscription, TripAdvisor would remove the negative reviews about them," Gupta said. "Perhaps if we subscribed, we wouldn't be listed as the dirtiest hotel in Asia." Annual and monthly subscriptions are capped at a fixed amount and are tiered according to the number of rooms and the hotel's location. Depending on hotel size, annual subscriptions range from $US360 ($NZ474) to $10,500 ($NZ13,838).
According to The New Paper, TripAdvisor denied Gupta's claims, saying its hotel ratings were not tied to business listings. More than 1000 hoteliers around the world have threatened to take legal action against TripAdvisor for damaging their businesses with allegedly malicious and unfounded reviews.
The lawsuits are being pursued by KwikChex, a British "reputation management" company, on behalf of a group of clients. A founder of KwikChex, Chris Emmins, said the company estimated there were at least 27,000 legally defamatory comments on TripAdvisor - "allegations that are false and should, if necessary, be tested in court".
The New Paper submitted a positive review about Goldkist to TripAdvisor. Two days later, the newspaper submitted a negative review about Goldkist, using a different username. The next day, the negative review was published on the website without any verification email from TripAdvisor, the paper says.
As for the positive review, TripAdvisor sent two emails asking for verification, asking: "Is this your review? Action required." The recipient had to click on a link provided in the email to verify that he or she wrote the review. The newspaper did so.
The latest Goldkist review to be posted on TripAdvisor labels the hotel "a disgrace to the nation".
Other travel booking sites have also got in on the reviewing business, but they, too, haven't been far from controversy.
A hotel in Queenstown has just discovered that travelocity.com mistakenly put bad consumer reviews of an American hotel under the wrong name. The error has been rectified but not until well after the damage was done.
It seems to me that consumers will react with great anger should they discover they've been lied to or deceived by any website that has put itself out there as a punter's pal, when in fact it was just a sharp business, complete with the necessary morality bypass. The danger of that is that consumers, especially travel buyers, have never had so much power and they will have no hesitation in acting collectively to destroy cheats.
Who are the websites you trust to consult before buying travel? Are there other reliable ways you have to make sure you're not going to be dudded? Have you come across instances where a hotel that was recommended has turned out to be a hole?
- Sydney Morning Herald
Sponsored links
Newest First
Oldest First
Those of you who consider TripAdvisor reliable: have you ever stayed at a place that had primarily negative reviews? Because those are the places that this article is talking about. If you only stayed at places that had positive reviews and had good experiences, that doesn't contradict this article at all, but you may be unfairly excluding other good accommodation from consideration.
I take any online reviews with a grain of salt. There is too much opportunity for disgruntled associates of any business to publish fake reviews, good or bad.
Trip Advisor should be taken to court.The reviews are posted at Trip advisor's arbitary dictatorial power and many positive ones are not posted while negative ones are posted immediately.Its not Trip's decision to post or not to post.They should post ALL reviews.When you phone them,there is no answer and they say it is random.It is actually drive -by slander with no consequences for Trip..They will deny it but if you subscibe to them,your positive ones will appear quicvkly and the negative ones randomly disappear. Hotelier's should start a class action suit .Tripadvisor is JUST another business and has NO right to slander other businesses.
Information Corruption is becoming more and more widespread - and the degree of sophistication in technique is climbing too. Review fraud (both positive and negative) is becoming far harder to spot. - and the only answer is going to be stronger verification to protect consumers and reputable businesses - especially smaller businesses that are extremely vulnerable to this type of attack.
The idea of TripAdvisor is initially good but why should I trust the advice of a stranger hiding behind a username? I've recently discovered kiwicollection.com, their ratings are made by experts who visit the hotels regularly.
I have seen some comments posted out of spike, as the client did not get what he asked for - for free, of course. Comments are good, but why people still stay in the hotels if its so bad and make ridiculous remarks thereafter. Check out and move on..... lots of choices out there.
Fake positive reviews are generally easy to spot too on TripAdvisor- when was the last time everything about your holiday accommodation was perfect?
ta can be a good thing but there is far too much 'massaging' of the truth to outright lies. rates arent great either.
I use booking.com and it seems pretty good so far. You can only leave a review if you've stayed there, so it's not so easy for fake reviews to get published.
Jaipur's blend of chaos and beauty
Welcome to the wild, wild west
Seeking escape from Carnival crowds
Berlin zero-star hotel awarded
Tourist numbers rise for January
Ten amazing Aussie hidden gems
Fiji holiday relief for quake victims
Air NZ extends earthquake deal
Getting the power back on after Christchurch earthquake
Small tsunami after Japan earthquake
Pike River Coal mine in receivers' hands
Man accused of shooting cop was 'weaving lies', court told
McCully demands answers over Carter death
Auckland to Christchurch run for earthquake relief
Former Alice in Chains rocker dies
$33m in stolen jewels found in Paris sewer
Egyptian women seeking equality attacked
Petrol price heading for record high
P-lab close to childcare centre
'Funnel cloud' seen over Auckland
Earthquake damaged Christchurch maternity hospital set for demolition
Christchurch earthquake: Latest information - Wednesday
Small tsunami after Japan earthquake
McCully demands answers over Carter death
Orca encounter unnerves Wellington triathlete
$33m in stolen jewels found in Paris sewer
Prince William to visit Christchurch for earthquake memorial
Earthquake damaged Christchurch maternity hospital set for demolition
Ten amazing Aussie hidden gems
Seven-year itch now three-year glitch
Bewigged judge rugby-tackles fleeing sex offender
$33m in stolen jewels found in Paris sewer
Kaspar the friendly robot helps autistic kids
Orca encounter unnerves Wellington triathlete
Christchurch earthquake: World out of chemical toilets
Should passengers be able to refuse a full-body scan or physical patdown?
Related story: 'Touch my junk: you'll be arrested'
![]("+my_static_host+"/1"+release_id+"/static/images/lightbox-close.gif)
NBC in America recently did a piece on not just misleading or accidentally mis-posted reviews, but actual fake reviews on TripAdvisor.
http://tripadvisorwatch.wordpress.com/2011/02/25/nbc-today-programme-exposes-fake-reviews-on-tripadvisor/